Tag Archives: doctor who

Trying to get to Atlanta!

Quick personal query. I really want to go to Dragon*con. Things went as they do, and stuff… lost the chance to get into the proper hotels. Now a coworker I had a slight chance of rooming with is going with her husband, so that’s out too. It’s getting 11th hour, but I just got the booklet in the mail rubbing in just how much I want to go. So even costumeless, I’m not quite resigned to not going just yet.

Is anyone going or know anyone (relatively not scary…) looking for a roomie? The official-ish hunt seems to be mostly a facebook thing and I haven’t gotten facebook straightened out yet!

As you’ve learned, I make crafts, am a bit of a science fangirl, and admire folklore and fantasy writing and art. Geek-wise I’m an avid whovian/sherlockian with a bit of a browncoat leaning. Last year my favorite track at the con was Skeptrack. I’m quiet in person unless you ask about one of said topics, not much of a party girl (sometimes for lack of invites and sometimes from shyness), and a nonsmoker.

Let me know if you have any ideas, please!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Warning: Word Rant

Death Riding by Albrecht Durer

I’m reading an excellent book by David P Clark called Germs, Genes, and Civilization. I like histories and epidemiology, so the two mixed together are right up my alley. It has several interesting aspects, mentions some things that ought to be obvious and yet are not really so self evident, and has a few really fun theories about plagues in Ancient History. Unfortunately it also hits fairly regularly on one of my pet peeves, which is a recurring issue in popular books on plagues and disease. It’s an English language geek one, so probably sounds pretty silly to most people.

The word decimate literally means to kill one out of every ten, from the Latin word decimus, meaning “tenth.” Think decimal system, they have similar roots. Using the word more loosely, but still appropriately, it should be used to refer to the death of a significant proportion of a population, but still in the ballpark of a tenth. Otherwise say, a quarter, a third, a half… a proportion with a hint of precision. The problem is that decimate has become a synonym for destroy, a word used when a very large portion, or a majority, are killed. (This is not to say that one tenth of a population being killed by anything is insignificant…)

One book I took out from the library used decimate in place of destroy approximately every five pages in a chapter on bubonic plague. I couldn’t take it anymore and brought it back to the library unfinished.

The problem is that it still holds its original meaning but is also in the process of that terrifying change whereby if enough people use a word incorrectly it eventually takes on the incorrect meaning. This problem becomes especially confusing when the meanings are a distance apart rather than a matter of nuance.

For example, in one part of the Clark book he was discussing about the decrease in virulence of a specific disease over time. On one page he refers to plague decimating the city, then the next page he points out that a few hundred years later it only killed one tenth of the population. Contrasting a word against its original (true) meaning doesn’t give any meaningful data or even a fair impression of the numbers we’re dealing with here.

Besides, if even super villains can get it right, surely academics can too?

1 Comment

Filed under Books, Historical Facts and Trivia

‘Tis the Season

 Made this in a monotype class last spring. A number of the leaves were from a bleeding heart, so I brought in the colors from the base plant. (Ferns, a japanese maple, and violet leaves sneaked in there too.) Didn’t turn out quite how I planned. Much more seasonal now than they were in the spring!

 A few favorites:

A while back the Guardian had an article with various authors telling tales of old Christmases. I loved the writing styles, and saved the link to savor over time. (And to be able to further investigate the authors I was unfamiliar with…) It’s always nice to get a sampling of multiple authors in a single piece. They all share a theme of the holidays, and are all a bit dark and quite funny. Enjoy!

Speaking of dark and funny, a snippet of the best adaptation of A Christmas Carol. The Muppet’s version, of course! Though of course, if you take your seasonal guilty pleasures with a quirkier twist, there’s always the Doctor Who episode with Dickens

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized