Tag Archives: bill bryson

Darwin Day

February 12th is traditionally recognized as Lincoln’s birthday, but it was also the birthday of naturalist Charles Darwin.

Darwin’s tree of life sketch.

What’s interesting and a more than a little terrifying is that just looking up Darwin Day will find you a barrage of anti-science websites and information.
So spare a little time to celebrate Darwin Day with a visit to a science museum, or to do something to support science education. You can visit http://darwinday.org/ for an interactive map to see if there are any special events in your area.
Or check a science book out from your local library!

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Books, Nature and Science

Clair Patterson, Rocks from Space, and Metal in the Air

It’s not a secret that I’ve got a soft spot for meteorites, especially the sort that I can get my hands on and turn into jewelry.


Since meteorites are samples of the universe outside our atmosphere they are kind of by definition awesome, excepting the occasional mass extinction event causation. But humans are knowingly creating the current age of mass extinction, so who are we to throw stones at non-sentient space rocks?


Clair Patterson

A scientist named Clair Patterson (1922-1995) used meteorites to help determine the age of the earth. In studying them to learn about our home, he discovered a much closer and more personal problem-atmospheric lead.

  Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Historical Facts and Trivia, Natural Science

Bad Moon Rising


Friday the 13th falling on a full moon strikes some as a particularly bad combination. (I’m generally not worried about Fridays no matter what the date unless it happens to be the Friday after Thanksgiving, then we’ll talk terror.) Experimentation has shown that neither Fridays that fall on the 13th day of the month nor (slightly more plausibly) full moons have any measurable effect on accidents. Scientific American had an interesting article on Lunacy and the Full Moon.


But the confluence of those two things and the belief they bring bad luck and madness reminded me of someone I first read about in Bill Bryson’s A Short History of Nearly Everything.


Thomas Midgley Jr.

Something of a human bad luck (for the planet) double whammy, Bryson introduces him as “…a regrettable Ohio inventor names Thomas Midgley, Jr. Midgley was an engineer by training, and the world would no doubt have been a safer place if he had stayed so. Instead he developed an interest in the industrial applications of chemistry.”


He worked under Charles F Kettering at GM and was the man who discovered that tetraethyl lead in gasoline reduced engine knock.


Lead was already known to be dangerous, but was still widely found in consumer products of all kinds.


Despite being a neurotoxin, it was easy to extract and work with, and as Bryson adds “almost embarrassingly profitable to produce industrially”. In 1923 General Motors, Du Pont and Standard Oil formed the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation and started producing lead for gasoline to the public.


Workers became ill at staggering rates and the Ethyl Corporation denied that lead had anything to do with it. And kept denying it.


In January of 1923 Midgley took a long vacation in Florida, saying that he needed to breathe fresh air after working with organic lead for the past year.


A year and a half later he touted tetraethyl lead’s safety at press conference, pouring it over his hands and inhaling its fumes and claiming he could do that daily with no ill effects. Shortly thereafter he went to Europe to be treated for lead poisoning.


Pleased by his success with lead, Midgley moved on. Showing “an instinct for the regrettable that was almost uncanny, he invented chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs.”


In the late 1920s refrigeration systems used refrigerants that could be toxic, corrosive, flammable and even explosive. GM had Kettering form a new team to investigate better alternatives. His new group included Midgley.


They needed a compound that was both highly volatile (vaporized easily) and chemically inert (something that wouldn’t react when exposed to other chemicals). Their group synthesized the first chlorofluorocarbon (CFCs). They named it Freon. Freon and its successors replaced the old refrigerants and eventually came to be used as propellants as well.


After his death it was found that CFCs may be nonreactive on ground, but when they reach the atmosphere they destroy the ozone layer.


Ozone molecules are formed by three oxygen atoms rather than the O2 we run across every breathing moment. Down here ozone is a pollutant, but in the upper atmosphere it absorbs 97-99% of the ultraviolet radiation from the sun.

Progression of the hole in the ozone layer.


The thickness of the ozone layer varies widely over the globe, and even by season. It’s generally thinner at the poles. But if it were spread evenly around the globe it would be a layer only 1/8 of an inch thick. This is what we have to protect us.


Ultraviolet light breaks CFCs down and their chlorine atoms escape. Those rogue chlorine atoms act as a catalyst and break apart the ozone molecules that create the ozone layer. A single chlorine atom can break down tens of thousands of molecules. One pound of CFCs can destroy seventy thousand pounds of ozone.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration diagram of how CFCs destroy ozone.


It is estimated that CFC molecules can stay in the upper atmosphere for about a century, destroying the ozone layer all along. CFCs are also greenhouse gases and trap more heat than carbon dioxide. Bryson describes them as heat sponges:


“A single CFC molecule is about ten thousand times more efficient at exacerbating greenhouse effects than a molecule of carbon dioxide-and carbon dioxide is of course no slouch itself as a greenhouse gas. In short, chlorofluorocarbons may ultimately prove to be just about the worst invention of the twentieth century.”


In the long term, Midgley’s discoveries gave us a world with high atmospheric lead levels impacting our physical health and mental well-being, plus a depleted ozone layer on a rapidly warming planet.


In Something New Under the Sun J. R. McNeil said Midgley “had more impact on the atmosphere than any other single organism in Earth’s history.”

1 Comment

Filed under Historical Facts and Trivia, Natural Science

Happy Maybe Bard’s Birthday

Sonnet 130

William Shakespeare



My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun;

Coral is far more red than her lips’ red;

If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun;

If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head.

I have seen roses damasked, red and white,

But no such roses see I in her cheeks;

And in some perfumes is there more delight

Than in the breath that from my mistress reeks.

I love to hear her speak, yet well I know

That music hath a far more pleasing sound;

I grant I never saw a goddess go;

My mistress when she walks treads on the ground.

     And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare

     As any she belied with false compare.



This is one of my favorite sonnets. I just like how the woman in question is made very human, and all the hyperbole saved for one final punch. It keeps it grounded, almost slightly mocking of love poems, until in the end it caves.


“…he is a kind of literary equivalent of an electron–forever there and not there.”*


A Charles Vess illustration of Shakespeare with Titania and Oberon looking over A Midsummer Night's Dream.

No one knows the exact date of Shakespeare’s birthday. He was baptized on April 26, 1564. He was probably born on the 24th or 25th. Tradition holds it to be April 23rd, because that was the day he died in 1616 and would have a wonderful sort of symmetry. But it would be highly unusual for a family to wait three days for a baptism, especially in a time of such high infant mortality.


We don’t know much about William Shakespeare’s life. He existed, married an older woman, had three kids, went to London, acted, wrote, went home a reasonably prosperous gentleman, and died.


This dearth of information has led to a lot of crazy conspiracy theories. (Yes, I did research them, and decide they were all B.S. In high school. Which is why their persistence drives me nuts. And when it comes up at work I can’t even engage in debate with people who espouse it. Here’s a great article about this phenomenon by the very charming Joe Nickell.


The thing is, he lived a long time ago. We’re lucky we have as many of his writings as we do, for this we owe his colleagues dear. Only one or two have been lost. Those of us English geeks are lucky there’s a grave to visit. 400 years may seem like nothing in human history, but think of the sheer number of people who have lived (and pushed and thrown out paper!) in that time. We know more about him than we do about any of the other major dramatists of his age.


As someone once pointed out his life is more of a mystery to us than a drama. But we gained some beautiful poetry and plays, and some words and phrases that still linger in the English language. To “vanish into thin air,” a “foregone conclusion,” to lose everything in “one fell swoop”


*Bryson, Bill. Shakespeare: The World as Stage. HarperCollins 2007. p 9


Filed under Historical Facts and Trivia, Poetry